Just a thought that popped into my head
devine at debiam.org
Wed May 8 09:30:57 PDT 2002
Ian Molton wrote:
> I'm all for testing GCC 3.x. It /will/ be the next compiler for linux
> systems, Im sure.
> BUT I dont think we should pre-approve unreleased versions of code on
> the basis of unstable current development releases.
That's precisely the purpose of putting gcc 3 in cvs, so that it's
stability and efficiency can be tested by volunteers. Then we'll have
concrete facts on which we'll be able to forge an opinion on the
subject of wheter to include gcc 3 in the next release of LFS or not.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev