Just a thought that popped into my head

Christophe Devine devine at debiam.org
Wed May 8 09:30:57 PDT 2002

Ian Molton wrote:

> I'm all for testing GCC 3.x. It /will/ be the next compiler for linux
> systems, Im sure.
> BUT I dont think we should pre-approve unreleased versions of code on
> the basis of unstable current development releases. 

That's precisely the purpose of putting gcc 3 in cvs, so that it's
stability and efficiency can be tested by volunteers. Then we'll have
concrete facts on which we'll be able to forge an opinion on the
subject of wheter to include gcc 3 in the next release of LFS or not.

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list