Pending GCC-3.1 upgrade - do or don't

Ian Molton spyro at
Wed May 8 09:54:09 PDT 2002

On Wed, 8 May 2002 10:56:40 -0400
Gerard Beekmans <gerard at> wrote:

> > If not faster, why upgrade? (noone has answered this yet, with the
> > (questionable) excpetion of C++ support which unless you use KDE is
> > only a VERY small fraction of packages. besides KDE compiles fine on
> > 2.95.3.)
> I don't think when lilo comes out with a new version it will boot your
> system any faster. But we do include it in the book and why don't you
> have anything to say about that? 

Because usually, it has fixes that allow it to work on more machines, or
boot newer kernels. actual /useful/ fixes.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list