GCC 3.x Pro's & Cons

Marc Heerdink marc at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed May 8 10:32:02 PDT 2002


Op wo 08-05-2002, om 19:30 schreef Ian Molton:
> On 08 May 2002 19:09:49 +0200
> Marc Heerdink <marc at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Please stop this discussion, it leads us knowhere. I see 8 people for
> > including 3.1 asap, 1 against. When we'd wait 6 months for people to
> > do intensive testing, 3.1.1 would be released and we'd have to wait
> > again.
> 
> Why? 6 months for a regression test and a good beating by geeks?

That's what you said, yes.

> And besides, why would we jump to 3.1.1?

Because it would probably contain major advantages over 3.1? That's what
new versions are for,

> why wouldnt we freeze on the first stable 3.1 version and then apply
> patches, like we do for 2.95.3 ?

We'd be using 2.95.4 if it was officially released.

-- 
         (__)
         (oo)
   /------\/
  / |    ||         ..."Have you mooed today?"...
 *  /\---/\   Marc Heerdink <marc at linuxfromscratch.org>
    ~~   ~~

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list