Just a thought that popped into my head

James Iwanek mail at chthon.freeserve.co.uk
Wed May 8 10:55:49 PDT 2002

time for me to open my mouth on this one:

now as NONE of you may have guessed sofar i have AS too
you cant say that as makes people difficult because it generally
dosnt, it CAN make SOME of us obstinate but i have met as many
non-as people who are just as "stubborn"
as for what ian has said about jesse being disrespectfull: you have
no right bringing ian's AS in to the matter so i aggree with ian on this one

AS causes social misunderstanding and makes it harder for us to understand
FACIAL-EXPRESSIONS and TONE OF VOICE it dosn' mean we cant see reason
it can make us appear rude at times but again i have seen many non-AS people
who are the same

James Iwanek

ps: lets give up the GCC-3 argument for the moment - it aint gonna get us
nowhere and besides
it is gerards choice after all

"Ian Molton" <spyro at armlinux.org> wrote in message
news:20020508183753.78b41cf5.spyro at armlinux.org...
> On Wed, 8 May 2002 10:15:54 -0700
> Jesse Tie-Ten-Quee <highos at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> > Yo,
> HoHo and a bottle of rum...
> > We never said we were not going todo a proper test.  You implied this.
> hm. gerard said he was going to use 3.1 on the strength of his current
> CVS gcc in one post. that does sound to me rather like any testing would
> be irrelevant and it will be used anyhow.
> How do you interpret that?
> > Yes, Gerard may seem like he's set in stone about upgradeing, however
> > that does not mean he is reckless in this,
> Thats what Im trying to find out - I want to know exactly how he is
> planning on doing this upgrade as he currently sounds like he has 'pre
> appproved' gcc 3.1
> > > I find that offensive.
> >
> > Yes, I figured you would and many others would also.  However, that
> > does not change the fact if you have AS.
> It is for ME to say I have AS (in public) and no-one else. Im sorry, but
> I dont want people making excuses for me and especially not telling
> people that arguing with me is futile because of AS, because it is NOT.
> I /will/ listen, but I also ask tough questions, which people dont like
> answering.
> > You have shown all the
> > sympons of it, and considering the nature of AS.. well, honestly,
> > trying to change your mind or even get you to listen to what we are
> > saying is futile.
> I find that offensive. please stop repeating it.
> > I did not mean dis-respect Ian, honestly.
> The above para. is a funny way of showing respect. Spouting
> misinformation about me.
> > Gcc 3.1 problably isn't going to be released for another two weeks
> > knowing the GCC Team.  It will at the least take Gerard and the other
> > book editors a week to test it ourselves and get it into CVS.  That
> > means we have a good _month_ to consider this, just to put it in CVS.
> >
> > The next planned release for LFS is 4.0 which is a *long* way away.
> > So moving it into CVS is not a bad thing, after all CVS is suppose to
> > be considered "development" material.
> Ok, fine - if its going into the CVS book //only// for a LONG time,
> thats great. fine. go right ahead.
> Why couldnt someone say that in the first place?
> --
> Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list