Just a thought that popped into my head
timothy at foce.eiomail.com
Wed May 8 11:55:49 PDT 2002
> > why don't we wait until 3.1 is released before
> > making any decisions about it. it may be different
> > than CVS. bugs may be fixed, etc. etc.
> > i suggest that this discussion be brought up again
> > after 3.1 is released.
> I agree. as long as 3.1 doesnt make it into LFS until AFTER the
> discussion and testing.
that's absurd dictator Ian.
i think this list is intelligent enough to make
the right decisions based on *evidence*.
if 3.1 turns out to be crap, i don't think that
Gerard would include it.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev