Pending GCC-3.1 upgrade - do or don't

Ian Molton spyro at
Wed May 8 14:04:51 PDT 2002

On Wed, 8 May 2002 14:40:48 -0500
Kelledin <kelledin at> wrote:

> Once gcc-3.1 is out, we'll simply update the LFS book with a note
> explaining that while gcc-2.95.3 is the safe default, gcc-3.1 is
> reported to produce faster code in many cases, and give a link to the
> gcc multi-version hint.  Each user can decide on his/her/its own.

I was beginning to think I was the only one thinking like that :)
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list