Bill Maltby LFS Related
lfsbill at wlmcs.com
Tue May 21 10:19:12 PDT 2002
On Mon, 20 May 2002, James Iwanek wrote:
> this means thet lilo might not need bin86 any longer
> after all why would any program need two asm compilers?
Well, maybe there is a good reason. Transition to a new
paradigm in small steps? For now, it needs two, but planned
a little later, it would all be in the new stuff?
> James Iwanek
> "seeker" <authenticseeker at techie.com> wrote in message
> news:200205201530.32516.authenticseeker at techie.com...
> > Just finished doing a new build with some new source files. It seems that
> > new version of lilo (22.3) needs nasm to compile completely. Just wanted
> > let you know and see if anyone else has the same results.
billm at wlmcs.com
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev