lilo-22.3

Bill Maltby LFS Related lfsbill at wlmcs.com
Tue May 21 10:19:12 PDT 2002


On Mon, 20 May 2002, James Iwanek wrote:

> this means thet lilo might not need bin86 any longer
> after all why would any program need two asm compilers?
> lol

Well, maybe there is a good reason. Transition to a new
paradigm in small steps? For now, it needs two, but planned
a little later, it would all be in the new stuff?

> -----
> James Iwanek
> 
> "seeker" <authenticseeker at techie.com> wrote in message
> news:200205201530.32516.authenticseeker at techie.com...
> > Just finished doing a new build with some new source files. It seems that
> the
> > new version of lilo (22.3) needs nasm to compile completely. Just wanted
> to
> > let you know and see if anyone else has the same results.

Bill Maltby
billm at wlmcs.com

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list