tush at yahoo.com
Sun May 26 21:57:05 PDT 2002
Albert Wagner wrote:
>Other than just being first-on-the-block, what are the advantages of gcc-3.1
>over gcc-2.95.3? Is gcc-3.1 planned for the next LFS? Sounds spooky to me.
>I notice the guru's here all catching errors and making patches just trying
>to get a base system running. Is a system built with gcc-3.1 going to be a
>safe production system? What about those of us who don't know how to turn a
>compile error into a patch and yet find ourselves needing packages that no
>one here has any need for or experience with?
Check out the archives for the past month for lfs-support and lfs-dev
ML/NG archives, many wars have been fought over the topic:)
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev