why gcc-3.1?

Tushar Teredesai tush at yahoo.com
Sun May 26 21:57:05 PDT 2002

Albert Wagner wrote:

>Other than just being first-on-the-block, what are the advantages of gcc-3.1 
>over gcc-2.95.3?  Is gcc-3.1 planned for the next LFS?  Sounds spooky to me.  
>I notice the guru's here all catching errors and making patches just trying 
>to get a base system running.  Is a system built with gcc-3.1 going to be a 
>safe production system?  What about those of us who don't know how to turn a 
>compile error into a patch and yet find ourselves needing packages that no 
>one here has any need for or experience with?
Check out the archives for the past month for lfs-support and lfs-dev 
ML/NG archives, many wars have been fought over the topic:)

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list