why gcc-3.1?

Ian Molton spyro at armlinux.org
Mon May 27 10:51:22 PDT 2002

On Mon, 27 May 2002 10:49:52 -0500
Albert Wagner <alwagner at tcac.net> wrote:

> > > Sounds spooky to me.
> >
> > Why?
> Because I don't see the advantages.

Where were you when we had this argument a fortnight back?

I think I speak for everyone when I say I dont think we want to have
this discussion again.

suffice to say that by the time the CVS book becomes real, GCC3.x.x will
probably be stable.

Im on your side for now. I dont think gcc3.1 is stable yet.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list