Collecting SBUs now

Gerard Beekmans gerard at
Tue May 28 08:38:56 PDT 2002

On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:10:16AM -0500, Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> >Now don't get too literal. If you get a 0.001 don't write 0.00 SBU that
> >wouldn't make sense. Make it 0.01 in such cases.
> >  
> >
> Or move the package with the shortest compile time in Ch 5 as the first 
> package to compile?

It then would make more sense to use a medium sized package as the base of
an unit (the shortest package would porobably be the kernel is about 2
seconds for me). I think bash would qualify as a good base.

Gerard Beekmans

-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list