Collecting SBUs now
maillist at hummelink.xs4all.nl
Wed May 29 17:06:49 PDT 2002
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 01:36, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:37:55AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> > Are SBUs /really/ *that* inaccurate for chap 6 anyway?
> Like I said, I don't know yet. So far I've only seen stats from too similar
> machines (my P4 2.2 Ghz and some Athlons in the 1600 and 1800 range which
> are pretty much the same as mine, all using the same compiler in chapter 5
> and 6). I would like to see some stats from lower end machines, say a 500
> Mhz machine or even lower.
> I know people need more time to build LFS on such machines so I'll just sit
> back and wait a little while longer.
If you have the patience to wait for my RMA'd hardisk and think it is
useful, i will do a build at 1066Mhz and 1 build at as low as i can get
the cpu to (500mhz prolly)
Cannot say how much time it will take though to receive the replacement
> Gerard Beekmans
> -*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
> Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev