Fw: Re: which c++-filt and libiberty

Matthias Benkmann matthias at winterdrache.de
Fri May 31 05:58:52 PDT 2002


Another, differing opinion on the c++-filt/libiberty issue

Begin forwarded message:

Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 21:41:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange.com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat.com>
Cc: <matthias at winterdrache.de>,  <gcc at gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: which c++-filt and libiberty


On Fri, 24 May 2002, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > Binutils and GCC both install c++-filt and libiberty. Which one should
> > I keep? Does it matter at all?
>
> For the most part, it doesn't matter.  Just pick the more recently
> released one.

I'd say the one with GCC should be used.  When
backward-compatibility can't be retained, you're better of with
one matching what the the installed gcc emits.

brgds, H-P



-- 
goto doesn't screw up programs.
Programmers screw up programs.

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list