netkit /etc/services vs port-assignments from IANA
rclark at cunning.com
Fri May 31 19:34:26 PDT 2002
Yup, it should work without any extra work except doing what Scot did
(comment out the top/bottom), but the system would generate aliases out
of the confusion..
Now, whether something DOES anything with the aliases is another matter.
Besides, damn thing is wrong anyway - I want SWAT at 901 ! :)
I did a conversion by loading the whole thing into Excel (ducks) as a
fixed width format file. I then had it make a new cell with a # + the
comments, cut the old comments field out. I figured I probably didn't
need any aliases anyway. Then I did a sort by the port name, killed all
the crap rows + rows that had no name. Final step, I sorted by port,
and wrote the whole lot back out to a text file.
The only thing I couldn't get to work was to get Excel to write it out
to the text file with proper tabs, so it looked like crap. At that
point I gave up, and went back to my current /etc/services (With SWAT,
and everything I needed anyway).
Maybe next time I will try OpenOffice :)
> Additionally the way my new file looks now, it would interprete the
> description words each as an alias (due to manpage case sensitive),
> means then a PROTOCOL is alias x-times and this would cause confusion
> I guess.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev