MailingList <==> NewsGroup Suggestion(s)

Bruce Dubbs bdubbs at
Wed Oct 2 08:01:30 PDT 2002

Mark Hymers wrote:

>On Wed, 02, Oct, 2002 at 12:32:32AM -0500, Tushar Teredesai spoke thus..
>>To remove redundancy, the references to the mailing lists should be 
>>removed from the LFS & BLFS books and instead they should point to the 
>>webpage that lists all the ML/NGs in detail?
>Actually, that's probably the most sensible suggestion I've heard in a
>while.  It would avoid having to keep resyncing the data (I noticed that
>lfs-chat is missing from the BLFS ML Page the other day; I still haven't
>got round to adding it).
>Alternatively, we could store the information on shadowfax and simply
>have a cronjob which converts it into the required format (HTML /
>Docbook XML) and commits it to cvs once a day if something has changed.
>That way, it'll always be up-to-date.
>Which way would people prefer?
Since its a an on-line resource, I would think a link would be 
appropriate.  It also solves a configuration management issue quote nicely.
  -- Bruce

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list