"ls" doesn't like a Glibc compiled with -fomit-frame-pointer

Billy O'Connor billy at oconnoronline.net
Thu Oct 3 15:28:01 PDT 2002

gerard at linuxfromscratch.org (Gerard Beekmans) writes:

> On October 3, 2002 06:16 am, Greg Schafer wrote:
> > So, using --enable-omitfp builds extra debug libs, increases overall build
> > time, and above all, seems like a bad idea.
> Yes I've come to agree with that a full 100%. I've started staying away from 
> the omit frame pointer option at all now. Maybe you gain a few bytes and 
> milliseconds but overall the extra potential trouble...
> Back to -O2 -march and -s

Not me, man.  I've segfaulted my last ls.  I'm going back to the book
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list