"ls" doesn't like a Glibc compiled with -fomit-frame-pointer
billy at oconnoronline.net
Thu Oct 3 15:28:01 PDT 2002
gerard at linuxfromscratch.org (Gerard Beekmans) writes:
> On October 3, 2002 06:16 am, Greg Schafer wrote:
> > So, using --enable-omitfp builds extra debug libs, increases overall build
> > time, and above all, seems like a bad idea.
> Yes I've come to agree with that a full 100%. I've started staying away from
> the omit frame pointer option at all now. Maybe you gain a few bytes and
> milliseconds but overall the extra potential trouble...
> Back to -O2 -march and -s
Not me, man. I've segfaulted my last ls. I'm going back to the book
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev