glibc-2.3 is out

Greg Schafer gschafer at
Fri Oct 4 20:55:29 PDT 2002

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:53:18AM -0500, Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> Confirmed:(
> While checking out the glibc FAQ, I saw this 
> <>. I am not an expert 
> so cannot say if that is the problem, but can a similar approach be 
> followed when compiling the static bash? One problem is that the host 
> most probably won't have static versions of the nss libs, so:( So we 
> might as well compile the static version of the new glibc on the host 
> (with a different prefix of course) and link static bash against it.

Yeah, I already pointed to that FAQ in an earlier thread. It just helps us
understand the problem. I don't believe it solves it for us :(

Gotta love LFS! Learning new stuff all the time!

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list