"ls" doesn't like a Glibc compiled with -fomit-frame-pointer
gschafer at zip.com.au
Fri Oct 4 21:01:57 PDT 2002
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 07:39:04PM -0600, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> On October 3, 2002 06:16 am, Greg Schafer wrote:
> > So, using --enable-omitfp builds extra debug libs, increases overall build
> > time, and above all, seems like a bad idea.
> Yes I've come to agree with that a full 100%. I've started staying away from
> the omit frame pointer option at all now. Maybe you gain a few bytes and
> milliseconds but overall the extra potential trouble...
> Back to -O2 -march and -s
Heh, don't give up on the -fomit-frame-pointer altogether! As MSB recently
pointed out on blfs-dev, it does have some real value for certain apps, just
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev