[roland at redhat.com: Re: More info on static binary/libnss* mystery]
billy at oconnoronline.net
Sun Oct 6 22:53:48 PDT 2002
gschafer at zip.com.au (Greg Schafer) writes:
> And here is the patch as suggested by Roland McGrath.
> MSB will probably hate it, but the way I see things, it seems
> like the smoothest option for the LFS community as a whole.
> Future LFS could say something like:-
> "if your host distro has glibc-2.2.5 or older then you will need to
> apply this patch to glibc-2.3"
> We do stuff like that already for other packages so..
> If it's good enuff for Redhat then it's good enuff for us! :)
Just kidding, great find, Greg!
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev