[roland at redhat.com: Re: More info on static binary/libnss* mystery]
mimi.ka at gmx.de
Mon Oct 7 03:26:05 PDT 2002
Greg Schafer wrote:
> And here is the patch as suggested by Roland McGrath.
> MSB will probably hate it, but the way I see things, it seems
> like the smoothest option for the LFS community as a whole.
> Future LFS could say something like:-
> "if your host distro has glibc-2.2.5 or older then you will need to
> apply this patch to glibc-2.3"
> We do stuff like that already for other packages so..
> If it's good enuff for Redhat then it's good enuff for us! :)
Does that mean that, if I will do a 'double build' (build a whole
glib2.3 system as base system) I need to aply this fix only at the first
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev