Jesse Tie-Ten-Quee highos at
Sat Oct 12 15:27:26 PDT 2002


On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 12:16:56AM +0200, Ronald Hummelink wrote:
> RH uses another procps, maintained by Michael Johnson of RH which is not
> well maintained (I think this is the procps 2.0.7 we used for long)

Actually rawhide seems to be using 2.0.10-1, so I was correct, here.

> What is really more interesting is: Which of the 2 procps (Sourceforge
> vs Surriel) will make the better package?
> If above is true, the Surriel version is closer to what we have now, or
> are both versions evolutions from procps 2.0.7?

I dunno.  But id bet Surriel at this point, mostly because it looks like
the kernel developers are actually updating it.

Jesse Tie-Ten-Quee  ( highos at linuxfromscratch dot org )
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list