Fw: gcc 3.2 patches

Gerard Beekmans gerard at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Oct 18 12:01:10 PDT 2002

On October 14, 2002 02:08 am, Matthias Benkmann wrote:
> The following message was sent to lfs-support. The problem this message
> points out is that the book does not explain what the problem is that the
> nofixincludes patch fixes. The current explanation "This prevents the
> fixincludes script from running." is just stating the obvious (when you
> look at the patch). The explanation should be improved to state WHY we're
> doing this and the explanation should be clear enough so that people see
> that this is only needed in chapter 5. Could someone please write such an
> explanation and also reply to the respective message on lfs-support. I
> don't remember the fixincludes discussion.

I've added an explanation to CVS. Now, I hope I got it right. I admit I did 
this quickly and haven't verified it against brainfarts and the like.

I'll reply to the lfs-support message in a minute.

Gerard Beekmans

-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list