unstable branch for LFS

Gerard Beekmans gerard at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Oct 18 13:02:44 PDT 2002

On October 16, 2002 08:15 am, James Spinks wrote:
> It should ultimately result in 3 branches that can be considered current: 
> The current actual release branch, the next release in the current version
> branch, and the next version branch.  Each one should be less stable than
> the one above it...  ;-)

This is an intruiging idea. I'll for sure keep this in mind when I'm making up 
my mind on how to proceed.

Gerard Beekmans

-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list