patch description missing for gcc

Timothy Bauscher timothy at
Sat Oct 19 14:33:53 PDT 2002

On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 02:24:27PM -0600, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> > Yes. I would like to see the book use separate, uncompressed,
> > well-described patches.
> Seperate in the sense of splitting up the current GCC and Glibc
> patches and instead provide 8 (or so) seperate patches?

IMO, each "fix" should have it's own patch. This is more
of a common-sense case-by-case thing than a written rule.
Have patch A fix problem A, and patch B fix problem B.

IOW, I'd like to see us stray away from patch merging.


-*- "Share and Enjoy" || "Go stick your head in a pig" -*-
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list