spyro at f2s.com
Sat Oct 26 11:34:10 PDT 2002
On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:19:05 +0000 (UTC)
lfsbill at wlmcs.com (Bill Maltby - LFS Related) wrote:
> Instead, we only have the tmpfs FS overhead, which should all be in
If you're lucky and it wasnt paged out to swap...
> But even if swap
> is hit, its overhead to the system is less than a file system.
Except tempfs IS a filesystem.
tempfs is a filesystem backed by swap.
my root fs is a filesystem backed by a disc.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev