Minor (unneeded?) omission in LFS 2002-0914?
archaic at comcast.net
Sat Sep 14 20:10:34 PDT 2002
On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 05:44:12PM -0400, Bill Maltby LFS Related wrote:
> Well folks, after all this time, I finally decided maybe it was worth a
> mention. I didn't find anyplace that told the poor noob user that exec and
> write permission is need in the untar area (like /usr/src). Is it needed?
> The system will tell them if they don't have it.
says to chown -R lfs $LFS/static
should be mkdir -p $LFS/static/usr/src
says to cd $LFS/usr/src (which doesn't exist yet, BTW. If it said
I'm not a fan of hand holding, but the intended area for compilation (if
strictly following the book) was always the $LFS/usr/src and now we have
typos dealing with the change to /static that don't properly refer to
this. Once fixed, no one needs permission on /usr/src, just $LFS/static
Live free or die; death is not the worst of evils.
- General George Stark.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev