GCC-2.95.3-2 from LFS 3.3 flunks the regression test in a big way

Kelledin kelledin+LFS at skarpsey.dyndns.org
Mon Sep 16 12:14:48 PDT 2002


On Monday 16 September 2002 01:49 pm, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> Don't you just hate it when they force you to use GNU tar? 
> That's one reason I keep it around...just to satisfy some
> rather stupid dependency on gtar :P

I know!  Technically, s-tar is the better performer, has more 
features, and is more POSIX compliant, but gnu tar has become 
the "concensus" standard, even with its POSIX incompliance.  
Something about that seems Just Plain Wrong(tm) to me. =(

-- 
Kelledin
"If a server crashes in a server farm and no one pings it, does 
it still cost four figures to fix?"

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list