glibc-2.3 in a week or two.
gschafer at zip.com.au
Thu Sep 19 14:58:12 PDT 2002
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 08:18:06PM +0100, Lee Hancock wrote:
> Maybe put lfs-4.0 on ice
Hmm, I don't think so. gcc-3.2 will not even build against it.
For LFS purposes, minimum gcc version to go with glibc-2.3 will
be gcc-3.2.1 which doesn't exist yet.
Suggesting we slip in a last minute massive upgrade to a core component
like glibc is ridiculous.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev