glibc-2.3 in a week or two.

Lee Hancock Lee at hancock1980.freeserve.co.uk
Fri Sep 20 01:07:35 PDT 2002


The development version 2.2.94 compiles without any problems, and the
testsuite compiles without any failure with gcc-3.2. Isn't gcc-3.2.1  due
out this week?
"Greg Schafer" <gschafer at zip.com.au> wrote in message
news:20020919215812.GA17376 at tigers-lfs.nsw.bigpond.net.au...
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 08:18:06PM +0100, Lee Hancock wrote:
> > Maybe put lfs-4.0 on ice
>
> Hmm, I don't think so.  gcc-3.2 will not even build against it.
>
> For LFS purposes, minimum gcc version to go with glibc-2.3 will
> be gcc-3.2.1 which doesn't exist yet.
>
> Suggesting we slip in a last minute massive upgrade to a core component
> like glibc is ridiculous.
>
> Greg
> --
> Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
> and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
>


-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list