Pure LFS hint v.1.0: About gcc-2.95.3
gschafer at zip.com.au
Sat Apr 5 19:59:49 PST 2003
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:20:16PM +0500, Vladimir Ogay wrote:
> In my humble opinion, gcc-2.95.3 needs to be compiled twice (at the
> least) for build a fully "self-contained" and "self-hosting" gcc.
> What do you think about it?
I don't think it necessary.
If you want to check for yourself, adapt the method I outlined in the link
If the installed bytes end up being identical then why bother? I haven't
done the test for the scenario you mention but I'd be willing to bet that a
2nd compile will achieve nothing.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev