Pure LFS - Warning about lost set +h

Bill's LFS Login lfsbill at wlmcs.com
Mon Apr 21 18:33:40 PDT 2003


Somewhere on the way to 2.2.8, set +h got lost. I just discovered that.
It is responsible for some *very* inconsistent behaviour when you are
working at the CLI and (re)running script portions after partial
completions of various parts.

As Greg and Ryan discussed before, you need this set *unless* you can be
certain of sequential straight-through scripts (or CLI) execution.

Bill Maltby
lfsbill at wlmcs.com

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list