Update to current packages or PLFS first?
ken at kenmoffat.uklinux.net
Tue Apr 29 23:52:42 PDT 2003
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> But if we go the update packages route first, we get into some issues, like
> glibc-2.3.2. It'll have a temporary cludge until pure-lfs is applied after
> which the cludge would be removed (touching a missing header file the issue
> was if I recall correctly).
My experience was that compilation of 2.3.2 failed (haven't got time to
search the archives, but it seemed to be inconsistencies in an include
file). Since other people succeeeded, I think perhaps my host (lfs-3.0)
wasn't up to date enough. But I won't be testing any new lfs builds for 2
to 3 weeks anyway, so I can't follow through on this (my test machine is at
last handling my mail etc).
Live Long or Prosper! No, wait, that wasn't it...
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev