Update to current packages or PLFS first?

Andrew Fyfe a.fyfe at tiscali.co.uk
Wed Apr 30 14:42:14 PDT 2003

Gerard Beekmans wrote:

> On April 29, 2003 10:25 pm, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> How about a third possibility.
> Update to PLFS and latest packages all at once. There's not a lot of testing 
> that needs to be done on these latest packages anyways. I've installed LFS 
> systems already and did not encounter any problems, except for that minor 
> Glibc hickup with it needing /bin/pwd and that header file (assert.h IIRC).
> Normally I wouldn't suggest doing these two major things at the same time, but 
> pure-lfs and the newer packages have had a lot of testing already. All that's 
> left is update the version numbers, and a new patch here and there.
> I'll let you guys ponder on that one and declare me either crazy or efficient 
> ;o)

This sounds like the best option at least for glibc-2.3.2 and gcc-3.2.2. 
Didn't some people have problems compiling glibc-2.3.2 and gcc-3.2.2 
using the current lfs build system?

Also it would be nice to see the make check/tests included in the book 
for all packages. This can save a lot of time and hassel if anything 
should go wrong, rather than waiting until you boot into your new system 
to find something doesn't work.

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list