Static Bash Units

Larry Lawrence larry at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed Apr 30 16:31:02 PDT 2003


On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 20:29:20 +0000, Gerard Beekmans wrote:

> On April 30, 2003 01:49 pm, Larry Lawrence wrote:
>> Alas, the now famous SBU must be replaced, as there is no static bash build
>> with PLFS.  If you already thought of this, great, if not, just a heads up.
> 
> I was just thinking the same thing.
> 
> It also seems we can keep the term SBU, we'll just redfine its meaning:
> 
> old meaning: static bash unit
> new meaning: static binutils unit
> 
> A static binutils is built as the first package in pure-lfs.txt
> 
> -- 
> Gerard Beekmans
> http://linuxfromscratch.org
> 
> /* Linux Consultant --- OSDN / DevChannel *
>  * Technical Writer --- CheapBytes        */
> 
> /* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */

That is a great solution.  I will still miss my conversion factor on this
machine (1 SBU == 1 second) but it's 250 less SBU's that I have to edit.

Larry
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list