Static Bash Units
larry at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed Apr 30 16:31:02 PDT 2003
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 20:29:20 +0000, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> On April 30, 2003 01:49 pm, Larry Lawrence wrote:
>> Alas, the now famous SBU must be replaced, as there is no static bash build
>> with PLFS. If you already thought of this, great, if not, just a heads up.
> I was just thinking the same thing.
> It also seems we can keep the term SBU, we'll just redfine its meaning:
> old meaning: static bash unit
> new meaning: static binutils unit
> A static binutils is built as the first package in pure-lfs.txt
> Gerard Beekmans
> /* Linux Consultant --- OSDN / DevChannel *
> * Technical Writer --- CheapBytes */
> /* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */
That is a great solution. I will still miss my conversion factor on this
machine (1 SBU == 1 second) but it's 250 less SBU's that I have to edit.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev