"last checked..." is more of an aside

Bill's LFS Login lfsbill at wlmcs.com
Sun Feb 2 06:15:49 PST 2003


On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Alex Groenewoud wrote:

>
> Bill's LFS Login wrote:
> > But then someone has to be alert for when they differ.
>
> No, I was suggesting to program this into the xml:
>
>   if  $package-current-version != $package-checked-version  then:
>           print "Last checked for version",$package-checked-version
>   fi

Good thought - I don't know XML and didn't think of it possibly having
that ability.

>
> or however you do that in xml stylesheets.  You then only have to
> maintain somewhere at the beginning of the xml sources a list of
> current-versions and checked-versions, just like it is done now.

I guess then the only question would be, will newer users be a little
confused by some showing the last checked and some not? If so, it may be
better to have it show in all cases.

> Alex

-- 
Bill Maltby
lfsbill at wlmcs.com

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list