Even more minor, Ch. 5, patch attached

Bill's LFS Login lfsbill at wlmcs.com
Mon Feb 3 15:32:24 PST 2003


I hate to do 'em 1 at a time, but being aware of your pending deadline, I
want to get 'em to you asap.

Let me know if you would rather I batched 'em up.

-- 
Bill Maltby
lfsbill at wlmcs.com
-------------- next part --------------
diff -r -U 4 CVS/XML/LFS/BOOK/chapter05/whystatic.xml CVS-Edit/XML/LFS/BOOK/chapter05/whystatic.xml
--- CVS/XML/LFS/BOOK/chapter05/whystatic.xml	2003-01-02 21:51:46.000000000 -0500
+++ CVS-Edit/XML/LFS/BOOK/chapter05/whystatic.xml	2003-02-03 18:28:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -19,9 +19,9 @@
 the name of the function, resulting in a much smaller executable. This
 executable has the disadvantage of being somewhat slower than a statically
 linked one, as the linking at run time takes a few moments.</para>
 
-<para>Aside form this small drawback, dynamic linking has two major advantages
+<para>Aside from this small drawback, dynamic linking has two major advantages
 over static linking. First, you need only one copy of the executable library
 code on your hard disk, instead of having many copies of the same code included
 into a whole bunch of programs -- thus saving disk space. Second, when several
 programs use the same library function at the same time, only one copy of the


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list