lilo 22.4.1 needs nasm
archaic at indy.rr.com
Tue Feb 4 15:35:15 PST 2003
"Adam Trilling" <agt10 at columbia.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.GSO.4.50.0302041625190.6542-100000 at dirge.cc.columbia.edu...
> > Wolfgang Landauer <w.landauer at gmx.de> wrote:
> > > Adam Trilling killed the keyboard with:
> > > > That's because -Os is the default :-p
> > >
> > > but -march=i486 isn't.
> > >
> > > "-s -O3 -march=i686 -mcpu=i686" works too with 0.91.
> > the screwups with compilation were introduced with 0.93 afaik...
> i think so too. i built 0.92 "-O3 -march=pentium2" and it works fine.
> also, -march=i486 causes 0.93 to fail on my box (as
does -march=i486 -Os).
Just out of curiosity, why would anyone optimize a bootloader? You're
not going to see a difference in speed. And on such a small package,
you're not going to see anything useful in the way of disk space savings
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev