Jack Brown jbrown at
Wed Feb 5 11:08:42 PST 2003

On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 12:54:48 -0600, Dan Osterrath wrote:

> OK, here it is. It can handle follwing ld versions: 2.13 2.13.1
> ...
> The the number of groups are >=2 and the number of digits per group has
> to be <=2 and >=1
> So these ones are invalid for example:

> 2
> 2.123
> 2.13.b

Actually it might be nice if there was a way to deal with something like
2.13.1b or 2.13b since alot of the GNU projects do seem to have a history
of using that type of notation for interm releases (bash for instance)
particularly for versions released on  Not too sure how
hard that would be, just a thought.

Jack Brown
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list