Pure LFS - latest work in progress
ronald at hummelink.xs4all.nl
Fri Feb 7 22:50:00 PST 2003
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 01:23, Nathan Ladd wrote:
> The hint mentions coming up with a more "clean" build order, but I couldn't
> think of any reasons why a different build order would be more "clean,"
> since none of the binaries I built linked against anything from my host
I do have 1 binary from glibc itself linked against host libraries. I
think it is very much non crucial, but nevertheless, it may be reason to
have a look since not only it links against hosts libs, it also appears
to be using the hosts dynamic loader (which kindof suprises me).
libpng.so.3 => /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 (0x1557d000)
libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x155a5000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x155b2000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x155d5000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x15556000)
The host is gentoo (/me is running, ducking and hiding!) which surely
has all sorts of stuff installed.
I left it off for now after building 2nd pass binutils for now.
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev