Pure LFS - latest work in progress

Ronald Hummelink ronald at hummelink.xs4all.nl
Fri Feb 7 22:50:00 PST 2003

On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 01:23, Nathan Ladd wrote:

> The hint mentions coming up with a more "clean" build order, but I couldn't 
> think of any reasons why a different build order would be more "clean," 
> since none of the binaries I built linked against anything from my host 
> system.

I do have 1 binary from glibc itself linked against host libraries. I
think it is very much non crucial, but nevertheless, it may be reason to
have a look since not only it links against hosts libs, it also appears
to be using the hosts dynamic loader (which kindof suprises me).

	libpng.so.3 => /usr/lib/libpng.so.3 (0x1557d000)
	libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x155a5000)
	libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x155b2000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x155d5000)
	/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x15556000)

The host is gentoo (/me is running, ducking and hiding!) which surely
has all sorts of stuff installed.

I left it off for now after building 2nd pass binutils for now.


Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list