More gcc/glibc weirdness

Arjan Oosting ajoostin at students.cs.uu.nl
Sun Feb 9 11:53:11 PST 2003


Greg Schafer wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 05:30:01PM +0100, Matthias Benkmann wrote:
> 
>>Have you checked whether HAVE_DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO is or is not defined in
>>the second case. Notice that the #undef is commented out, so it's not
>>actually being #undef'd. It could be that on a normal system the
>>HAVE_DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO is already imported from somewhere else and
>>doesn't need to be #defined.
> 
> 
> Yes. AFAICT, HAVE_DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO is meant to remain commented out on a
> "sane" system with current tools. This equates with:-
> 
> checking for DWARF2 unwind info support... no_registry_needed
Hi,

I just check my log files for DWARF occurences and got the following 
two. My first glibc build gives:
	checking for DWARF2 unwind info support... yes
And the second build gives:
	checking for DWARF2 unwind info support... no_registry_needed

Hope u can use this information

Greetings Arjan Oosting

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list