vim patch no longer needed

Matthew Burgess ca9mbu at eos.sunderland.ac.uk
Mon Feb 10 12:41:06 PST 2003


"Zack Winkles" <winkie093 at bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:20030210153513.1c2d371a.winkie093 at bellsouth.net...
> (see subject line)

Why is it no longer required?  I thought it was to fix a gcc-3.2+
compilation problem.  There's been no official release of Vim since
(although they do have a patch available on the ftp server - one of 320
I don't fancy finding the exact reference now).  Does
gcc-3.2.1/gcc-3.2.2 somehow manage to cope with Vims' broken syntax?


-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list