jim at jg555.com
Tue Feb 11 12:09:17 PST 2003
When I installed, none of the symlinks were needed, the 5.3 has those in
it's make install now.
"Jack Brown" <jbrown at kmts.ca> wrote in message
news:pan.2003.02.11.17.51.11.795840.218 at kmts.ca...
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:37:13 -0600, Larry Lawrence wrote:
> > I've done no additional research, but on my install, I did not need the
> > first symlink, a symlink was created with the install time stamp. This
> > was not on a clean install, but an upgrade in which I am clearing the
> > symlinks prior to install.
> > Larry
> I can verify this too, I's been bugzillaed.
> Jack Brown
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev