jbrown at kmts.ca
Tue Feb 11 12:54:07 PST 2003
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:09:17 -0600, Jim Gifford wrote:
> When I installed, none of the symlinks were needed, the 5.3 has those in
> it's make install now.
> "Jack Brown" <jbrown at kmts.ca> wrote in message
> news:pan.2003.02.11.17.51.11.795840.218 at kmts.ca...
>> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:37:13 -0600, Larry Lawrence wrote:
>> > I've done no additional research, but on my install, I did not need
>> > the first symlink, a symlink was created with the install time stamp.
>> > This was not on a clean install, but an upgrade in which I am
>> > clearing the symlinks prior to install.
>> > Larry
>> I can verify this too, I's been bugzillaed.
>> Jack Brown
I'm pretty sure it still doesn't properly deal with splitting the
symlinks between /lib and /usr/lib, if you move the ncurses libs from
/usr/lib to /lib, the links will be there but won't point to the right
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev