More on Pure LFS

Jules Bjørn Colding JuBColding at
Thu Feb 13 03:02:03 PST 2003

Great, thanks.

But, wouldn't the new gcc/binutils have the correct spec and linker
scripts automatically or do they "inherit" the stage1 setup from ch 5?


On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 11:54, Greg Schafer wrote:
> > On a related note.. I have now compiled lots of stuff from ch 6. That's
> > fine, but the downside is that it all thinks that it needs
> > /stage1/lib/ to run :-( 
> > 
> > I think the reason is that my chroot PATH is
> > "PATH=/stage1/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin". Putting /stage1/bin at
> > the end should get my new gcc to be the preferred compiler.
> Yes, that is part of the problem. The other part involves changing the gcc
> specs file and linker scripts again in Ch 6.
> Apologies re this. I'll get Ch 6 written into the hint ASAP, so that the way
> forward for you is clear.

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list