pure_lfs hint updated

Tushar Teredesai tushar at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed Feb 19 12:12:13 PST 2003


Nathan Ladd wrote:

>I just checked out the new hint, and I just noticed gcc 2.95.x gets 
>built.  Is it worth mentioning a way to deal with gcc's libraries that 
>often bin-only programs (like flash and java) link against?  I'm going 
>to run through and add /opt/gcc's lib dirs to my ld.so.conf and see if 
>things work, but this is an issue that comes up quite often on irc and 
>lfs-support, and if it were included (esp. if pure lfs were folded into 
>5.0), a lot of things that require extra effort would "just work."
>  
>
It will work, though you will need to create the symlinks that are 
required by these plugins.

BTW, the gcc2libs are built in the blfs book.

-- 
Tushar Teredesai
   http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
   http://www.geocities.com/tushar/


-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list