pure_lfs hint updated

Tushar Teredesai tushar at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed Feb 19 12:12:13 PST 2003

Nathan Ladd wrote:

>I just checked out the new hint, and I just noticed gcc 2.95.x gets 
>built.  Is it worth mentioning a way to deal with gcc's libraries that 
>often bin-only programs (like flash and java) link against?  I'm going 
>to run through and add /opt/gcc's lib dirs to my ld.so.conf and see if 
>things work, but this is an issue that comes up quite often on irc and 
>lfs-support, and if it were included (esp. if pure lfs were folded into 
>5.0), a lot of things that require extra effort would "just work."
It will work, though you will need to create the symlinks that are 
required by these plugins.

BTW, the gcc2libs are built in the blfs book.

Tushar Teredesai

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list