pure-lfs - starting a new build

Ryan.Oliver at pha.com.au Ryan.Oliver at pha.com.au
Wed Feb 19 15:12:25 PST 2003


Richard A Downing wrote:

> I'm about to start a new LFS build, my old one has some twisted
> binutil/gcc mistakes in it, and I want a clean start.
>
> I'd like to use binutils-2.13.90.0.18 and gcc-3.2.2 in this.  My current
> system uses gcc-3.2.2/glibc-2.3.1/binutils-2.13.2.1.
>
> Is it OK to use the Pure-lfs hint as it stands and substitute these
> versions?  Gcc-3.2.2 appears to have the binutils-n-dot fix in it, so I
> can't see a problem, but I don't follow all the mailings on this - many
of
> them are over my head at my current level of understanding.
>
> --
> cheers,
> Richard.
>
> Richard A Downing FBCS

I don't see any issues with it, you may not need the binutils patch though,
so check that first.

With coreutils, I couldn't tell you :-) but would love to hear how you make
out :-)

Regards
Ryan

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list