pure-lfs - using binutils-2.13.90 series
gschafer at zip.com.au
Thu Feb 20 01:07:02 PST 2003
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:08:36AM +0000, Richard A Downing wrote:
> Well, unfortunately I've met an immediate and insuperable (for me) obstacle:
> binutils-220.127.116.11.18 uses a different configure/make process to the old
> series. The top level configure script only build the top level Makefile,
> and each subsystem run's its own configure as part of make. This results
> in an immediate failure with the pure-lfs LDFLAGS as sown below. I'm not a
> good enough autoconf wizard to debug this, so unless it's obvious to
> someone elase out there, I'm going back to GNU for binutils. Pity.
> I did some tests, it's the -all-static that it doesn't like!
Richard, check out this post. It may help.
For the time being, I'm back onto the FSF binutils while doing the pure_lfs
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message
More information about the lfs-dev