More gcc/glibc weirdness

James Iwanek chthon at
Thu Feb 20 08:35:31 PST 2003

Gerard Beekmans wrote:

> On February 10, 2003 06:53 pm, James Iwanek wrote:
>> i thought that the next release was going to be 5.0 because of the glibc
>> changes?
> And then the next release will be 6.0 with all those pure-lfs changes in
> it. Seems a bit too much to jump major version numbers three times in a
> row. And the current changes compared to the upcoming ones are pretty
> minor.

why not 4.1, 4.2 then 5.0? ;-)

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list