More gcc/glibc weirdness

Gerard Beekmans gerard at
Thu Feb 20 08:36:53 PST 2003

On February 20, 2003 09:35 am, James Iwanek wrote:
> why not 4.1, 4.2 then 5.0? ;-)

If the upcoming is 4.1, the pure-lfs changes 4.2 then what will be 5.0? If the 
pure-lfs changes cannot be justified to increase the major number, we'll 
probably never, ever increase the major number again ;)

Gerard Beekmans

-*- If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem -*-
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list