More gcc/glibc weirdness

James Iwanek chthon at chthon-uk.com
Thu Feb 20 08:52:26 PST 2003


Gerard Beekmans wrote:

> On February 20, 2003 09:35 am, James Iwanek wrote:
>> why not 4.1, 4.2 then 5.0? ;-)
> 
> If the upcoming is 4.1, the pure-lfs changes 4.2 then what will be 5.0? If
> the pure-lfs changes cannot be justified to increase the major number,
> we'll probably never, ever increase the major number again ;)
> 

oops ;-) i should have counted from 4.0 shouln't i ;-)

-----
Jay
-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list