Pure LFS - good to go

Matthew Burgess ca9mbu at eos.sunderland.ac.uk
Thu Feb 20 11:03:48 PST 2003

"Jeroen Coumans" <jeroencoumans at gmx.net> wrote in message
news:3E5520BF.90706 at gmx.net...
> I agree with Tush that we should have an lfs-patches mailinglist where
> patches from vendors can be evaluated and added.

+1 here!  It would also allow us to incorporate security related patches
(from bugtraq, et al.) in the event that an official release isn't
available at the time of a new LFS revision.

> It scares me that
> important things like the above aren't fixed. I assume it's something
> that Alan also implied in his criticism against LFS's toolchain.

Assumptions & implications...easily avoidable if Alan would have come
straight out and said something like "Until LFS fixes their toolchain
(it's broken because of X)..." then we'd all be the wiser.


Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-dev' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list